Kritik Atas Kitab Al-Maghazi Karya Ma’mar Ibn Rasyid Terhadap Konstruk Penulisan

Authors

  • Anugrah Eran Batu UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v4i2-02

Keywords:

Criticism, Writing Construction, al-Maghazi

Abstract

Arguments that Ma’mar is the figure responsible for the organisation of the book of Al-Maghazi, apparently ignore the construction of writing and unreasonable. this study aims to critique the systematic writing of the book of Al-Maghazi by Ma’mar ibn Rashid. There are at least two questions asked, (1) what are the factors that influence Ma’mar ibn Rashid in writing the book of Al-Maghazi, (2) how Ma’mar ibn Rashid's efforts in writing the book of Al-Maghazi. In answering the research problem, the researcher used a qualitative method with the type of literature study research. This study concludes that, First, the general factors that usually influence historical works are: original sources, writing objectives, ideology and personal views, historical context, the interests of the people, historical methods, cultural and linguistic influences, support or encouragement from colleagues or religious authorities, access to writing sources and the influence of other cultures and civilisations. Secondly, possible efforts were also made by Ma’mar ibn Rashid in writing the book of Al-Maghazi, namely: research and collection of sources, verification of authenticity and reliability of the narrative, analysis and selection of information, writing in historical style, structure and organisation, cultural influences and literary norms, purpose of publication, use of diverse sources, compilation of chronology, consideration of religious values and norms, criticality and objectivity, and contribution to Islamic history. Third, the content of the book begins with the story of the digging of the Zamzam well and ends with the story of Fāṭimah's marriage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Affan, M. (2018). Al-Maghazi /The Expeditions. Afkaruna, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2018.0083.128-132

Anthony, S. W. (2014). Ma ‘mar ibn Rāshid: The Expeditions. New York: New York University Press.

Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., Roth, K., & Gergen, M. M. (2009). Einführung in den sozialen Konstruktionismus. Carl-Auer-Verlag Heidelberg.

Ibn Rāshid, M. (2014). The Expeditions: An Early Biography of Muḥammad (Vol. 21). New York: New York University Press.

Kelpetin, M. (2023). A Pioneer of Sīra Literature: Ma ‘mar b. Rāshid. İSTEM, 41, 1–14.

Lifshitz, F. (2015). Relics and Writing in Late Medieval England. JSTOR.

Lilis, N. (2009). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Maraknya Karya Sastra Yang Mengupas Persoalan Seksualitas Dan Tubuh Dalam Kesusastraan Indonesia Modern Pada Era Reformasi. Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak, 4(1), 100–121.

Lindstedt, I. (2015). New Interpretations of the Origins of Islam. History: Reviews of New Books, 43(4), 116–119.

Milwright, M. (2015). Material Evidence and Narrative Sources: Interdisciplinary Studies of the History of the Muslim Middle East. (Islamic History and Civilization, Studies and Texts 108.). JSTOR.

Muhid, M., Ilyas, M., & Nurita, A. (2023). معمر بن راشد الأزدي ودوره في تاريخ تطور الحديث بعد تدوينه كتابا" الجامع" والمغازي" أنموذجا. El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis, 12(1), 117–133.

Munt, H. (2015). Reviews: The Expeditions: An Early Biography of Muhammad. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. University of London, 78(3), 612.

Pradita, Y. (2021). Memaknai Kisah Daud dan Batsyeba Melalui Kritik Naratif Dalam Teks 2 Samuel 11:1-27. Danum Pambelum: Jurnal Teologi Dan Musik Gereja, 1(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.54170/dp.v1i1.38

Pratama, F. S. P. (2022). Analisis Komparatif Historiografi Sirah Nabawiyah Karya Ibnu Ishaq Dan Ibnu Hisyam. Tabuah, 26(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.37108/tabuah.v26i1.677

Waqidi, A. (2012). Kitab Al Maghazi Muhammad: Sumber Sejarah Paling Tua Tentang Kisah Hidup Rasulullah. Jakarta: Zaytuna.

Kusumah, I. H. (2018). Corak dan metode penulisan kitab AL Maghazi karya Al Waqidi dan pengaruhnya terhadap Ibnu Sa’ad, Ibnu Katsir dan Ibnu Khaldun [Diploma, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung]. https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/16687/

Zed, M. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Kritik Atas Kitab Al-Maghazi Karya Ma’mar Ibn Rasyid Terhadap Konstruk Penulisan. (2021). Journal of Hadith Studies, 4(2), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v4i2-02