Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Urgensi Ilmu Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl dalam Menilai Kualitas Hadis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v5i1-03Keywords:
Hadith, Jarḥ wa al-Ta’dīl , OrientalistAbstract
This paper offers a critical review of the article “The Urgency of the Science of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl in Determining the Authenticity of Hadith” by Muh. Haris Zubaidillah, Basyrul Muvid, and Srifariyati. The article underscores the crucial role of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl in evaluating hadith authenticity by examining the reliability and credibility of narrators within the chain of transmission (isnād). The authors argue that this discipline forms a key mechanism in hadith criticism, where both isnād (the chain of narrators) and matn (the textual content) are fundamental components in verifying the validity of a hadith. This review applies a library research method with an analytical approach, focusing on the coherence of arguments and the methodological design presented by the original authors. The review appreciates the authors' consistency in affirming the significance of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl as an essential discipline in hadith studies. It also highlights the necessity for hadith scholars to possess competence in this field to determine the acceptability or rejection of transmitted narrations accurately. Additionally, the review commends the authors’ reflective efforts to respond to skeptical perspectives that challenge the reliability of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl as a scientific approach. However, it also notes a critical shortcoming: the article does not sufficiently develop a strong and systematic argument to counter orientalist critiques that question the authenticity of hadith. Strengthening this aspect would enhance the article’s academic contribution and its role in contemporary discourse on hadith criticism.
Downloads
References
’Itr, N. (1981). Manhaj al-Naqd fi ’Ulum al-Hadis. Dar al-Fikr.
Al-A’ẓamī, M. M. (1972). Studies in Early Hadith Literature: With a Critical Edition of Some Early Texts. American Trust Publications.
Al-Dhahabī, Ḥ. (1998). Al-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn (Vol. 2). Maktabah Wahbah.
Al-Mālikī, S. M. ʿA. (1994). Manhaj al-Salaf fī Fahm al-Naṣūṣ. Dār al-Maʿrifah.
Ali, M. A. M., Ibrahim, M. N., Usman, A. H., Nazri, M. A., & Kadir, M. N. A. (2015). Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dil (Criticism and Praise): It’s significant in the science of hadith. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2S1), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s1p284
Aly Mahmudi, M. (2021). Studi Pemikiran MM. Adzami Ahli Hadist Melawan Orientalis.
Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir, 4(1), 81–94. http://ejournal.iai-
tabah.ac.id/index.php/Alfurqon/article/view/693
Asaad, M. (2019). Kritik Hadis Berdasarkan Metodologi Hadis. Farabi, 16(1), 19–33.
https://doi.org/10.30603/jf.v16i1.1032
Bahrul Ma’ani. (2010). AL-JARH WA AL-TA’DI L: UPAYA M EN GH IN DARI SKEPTI S
DAN H ADI S PALSU. Media Akademika No. 2, orisinal, Volume 25,.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (A. Fawaid & R. K. Pancasari (penerj.); 4 ed.). PUSTAKA BELAJAR.
Fauzan, A. (2018). Studi Komparatif Teori Ilmu Hadis Al-Hakim Al-Naisaburiy Dan Ibnu Shalah. EL-AFKAR : Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis, 7(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.29300/jpkth.v7i1.1587
Ibn Taymiyyah, A. (n.d.). Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. al-Maktabah al-Salafiyyah.
Ibrahim, N. (2020). Wrong Reasoning by Texts and Sayings of Critics in Crediting and Discrediting (al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil) Kesimpulan yang Salah dengan Teks dan Ucapan Pengkritik dalam al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil. International Islamic University Malaysia, 4.
Jahalat, K., Peningkatannya, A. D. A. N., Hadisperspektif, D., Ajjaj, M., Pesantren, I., Abdul, K. H., & Mojokerto, C. (2019). DAN MAHMUD AL-TAHHAN Habieb Bullah Bullah A . PENDAHULUAN Perkembangan khazanah keilmuan hadis , para ulama kontemporer juga ikut andil dalam pemikiran keilmuan hadis . Mereka adalah Muhammad ‘ Ajjaj al-Khatib dan Mahmud al- zamannya . Kedua ulama tersebu. 1(September).
Kodir, A. A. (2021). WAKTU DAN TEMPAT KEMUNCULAN HADIS: Suatu Diskursus Kesarjanaan. Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis, 9(01), 25. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v9i01.8384
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3 ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhammad Qomarullah. (2019). Kontekstualisasi Ilmu Al- Jarh Wa At-Ta’Dil Dalam Upaya Memilih Wakil Rakyat Dan Korelasinya Dengan Teori Kredibilitas. Diroyah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 3(2), 45–54.
Muna, A. C. (2016). Kritik Pandangan G.H.A. Juynboll terhadap Ilmu al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil. Kalimah, 14(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i1.359
Muvid, M. B., Arsyillah, B. T., & Muammar. (2022). Ilmu Jarh Wa Al-Ta‘dil Dalam Tinjauan Studi Hadits. UNIVERSUM : Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan, 16(1), 34–55.
Siti Fatimah. (2014). SISTEM ISNAD DAN OTENTISITAS HADITS : Kajian Orientalis dan Gugatan Atasnya. Ulul Albab, 15(2), 206–221.
Srifariyati. (2020). Urgensi Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’dil dalam menentukan kualitas Hadist. Jurnal Madaniyah, 10, 131–146.
Taufiqurrahman, T. (2019). Kritik Hadits Dalam Kawasan Kajian Sejarah. Jurnal Ulunnuha, 8(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.15548/ju.v8i1.297
Thahan, M. al-. (2010). Taisir Musthalah al-Hadis. Maktabah al-Ma’arif.
Zed, M. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Zubaidillah, M. H. (2018). Ilmu Jarh Wa Ta’Dil. Studi Hadis, 02(02), 1–14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zahrotul Izzah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
