Teori dan Metodologi Sanad Hadis: Kajian Jarḥ wa Ta’dīl

Muhammad Imaduddin; M Khairul Hafiz  Akbar

doi:10.32506/johs.v6i2-05

Authors

Muhammad Imaduddin UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Author
M Khairul Hafiz Akbar UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v6i2-05

Keywords:

jarh wa ta'dil, Narrators, Hadith

Abstract

The status of hadith as a foundational source of Islamic law necessitates rigorous criticism and verification from various dimensions. This imperative becomes particularly significant in light of the proliferation of mawḍūʿ (fabricated) hadiths, which increased substantially following the era of Fitnah. The widespread circulation of such fabrications resulted in the merging of spurious reports with authentic traditions, thereby complicating the process of authentication. In this context, the role of hadith transmitters (narrators) emerges as a pivotal element in determining the validity of a hadith, wherein the assessment of a narrator’s credibility is essential. The discipline of jarḥ wa taʿdīl provides a systematic and methodological framework established by classical scholars to evaluate the reliability of narrators. As socio-religious contexts continue to evolve and knowledge becomes increasingly digitized, the urgency of revisiting and recontextualizing this field becomes more apparent. This study seeks to map the scholarly discourse on jarḥ wa taʿdīlby analyzing academic works published between 2016 and 2023. Employing the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, this research reveals that the methodological development within jarḥ wa taʿdīl studies remains largely stagnant, with the majority of contemporary literature focusing on definitional aspects, historical trajectories, foundational principles, and classical applications as articulated by early Islamic scholars. However, the study also identifies emerging trends that suggest potential areas of innovation. These include the application of jarḥ wa taʿdīl principles in contemporary religious and social contexts, as well as a growing interest in digital methodologies for hadith evaluation. Such developments highlight the need for sustained and methodologically robust scholarly efforts aimed at revitalizing the study of jarḥ wa taʿdīl and adapting its principles to contemporary challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Anwari, A. U. M. (2025). Melacak Konstruksi Dasar ‘Adālah al-Rāwī dalam Tradisi Sufi [Tesis]. UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

al-Ghazālī, A. H. (n.d.). Al-Mustaṣfā min ’Ilm al-Uṣūl (Vol. 4). Al-Jāmi’ah al-Islāmiyyah-Kuliyyah al-Syarī’ah.

al-Khaṭīb, M. ’Ajjāj. (2006). Ushūl al-Hadīṡ: ’Ulūmuhu wa Musthalahu. Dār al-Fikr.

al-Qaṭṭān, M. (2007). Mabāḥiṡ fī ’Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ. Maktabah Wahbah.

al-Suyūṭī, J. al-Dīn. (1994). Tadrib al-Rāwī fī Syarḥ Taqrīb al-Nawāwī. Maktabah al-Kauṡar.

Ali, M. A. M., Ibrahim, M. N., Usman, A. H., Nazri, M. A., & Kadir, M. N. A. (2015). Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dil (Criticism and Praise): It’s Significant in the Science of Hadith. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2).

al-Sibā’ī, M. (n.d.). Al-Sunnah wa Makānatuhā fī al-Tasyrī’ al-Islāmī. Dār al-Warrāq.

Anwari, A. U. M. A., Trenggono, M. I., & Asyahudi, M. F. (2023). Reexamining the Credibility of the Joseph Schacht Concept of Sanad Hadith. Jurnal Living Hadis, 8(2).

Asfiyak, K. (2019). Jarh Wa Ta’dil: Sebuah Pemodelan Teori Kritik Periwayatan Hadis Nabawi. JAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah, 1(1).

ash-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (1988). Sejarah Perkembangan Hadis. Bulan Bintang.

Azami, M. M. (2020). Hadis Nabawi dan Sejarah Kodifikasinya (A. M. Ya’qub, Trans.). Pustaka Firdaus.

Darta, A. (2019). Aplikasi al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil Muhammad al-Ghazali dan Ali Mustofa Ya’kuf. Al-I’jaz : Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam, 5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/al-i'jaz.v5i2.5765

Dzulraidi, D. H. (2023). Abû Al-Fath Al-Azdī In Jarh Wa Ta’dīl According To Ibn Hajar Al- Asqalānī. IJQK: International Journal of Al-Qur’an and Knowledge, 3(1).

Faruq, A. I. A. (2018). Metode Jarḥ wa al-Ta’dīl Kelompok Mutashaddid dan Mutasāhil (Telaah Pemikiran Yaḥyā ibn Ma’īn dan al-Turmudhī Perspektif Sosiologi Pengetahuan). Diyā Al-Afkār: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an Dan al-Hadis, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v6i01.2805

Fikri, S., Aini, R. R., Mulyowati, B., & Adrebi, F. S. (2024). Penggunaan Prinsip Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dil dalam Menyaring Fatwa-Fatwa Digital di Platform Media Sosial. TARBAWI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 12(2).

Fuqaha’, Z. (2017). Studi Komparasi Jarh wa Ta’dīl Dan Kajian Islam Modern Terhadap Hadis-Hadis Tentang Sîrah Nabi saw. Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v3i1.3439

Hāsyim, A.-Ḥusainy A. al-Majīd. (n.d.). Al-Imām al-Bukhāry Muhaddiṡan wa Faqīhan. Miṣr al-’Arabiyyah.

Ibn al-Manzhur. (1990). Lisan al-Arabiy. Dar al-Fikr.

Idri. (2020). Problematika Autentisitas Hadis Nabi Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Kencana.

Imron, A. (2017). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’dil. Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(2).

Ismail, S. (1992). Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi. Bulan Bintang.

Istianah. (2017). ANALYSIS KONTRIBUSI ALI MUSTAFA YAQUB (1952-2016) DALAM DINAMIKA KAJIAN HADIS DI INDONESIA. Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v3i1.3442

Maulid, P. H. (2022). Analisis Aplikasi Ensiklopedia Hadis 9 Imam Versi Android sebagai Sarana Dakwah di Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15575/jpiu.v2i2.14393

Muna, A. C. (2016). Kritik Pandangan G.H.A. Juynboll terhadap Ilmu al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i1.359

Muslim Ibn al-Hajjaj. (2014). Shahih Muslim. Dar al-Tashil.

Nugroho, I. Y. (2020). Orientalisme dan Hadits: Kritik terhadap Sanad menurut Pemikiran Joseph Schacht. Asy-Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(2).

Raffi’u, A. S., Arifin, T., & Dadah. (2023). ILMU JARḤWA TA’DīL: Kajian Sejarah dan Urgensinya di Era Kontemporer. Muaʾṣarah: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18592/msr.v5i1.8586

Ritonga, M. T. (2022). Metodologi Ulama Hadis dalam Jarh dan Ta’dil. Al-Kaffah: Jurnal Kajian Nilai-Nilai Keislaman, 10(1).

Saifuddin, Moh., Muhid, & Nurita, A. (2023). Manhaj Jamaluddin Al-Qasimi Dalam Penerapan Ilmu Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dil. Al-Hikam: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.36835/hjsk.v13i02.4035

Sani, A. (2023). Pergeseran Metodologi Kesahihan Sanad Hadis dalam Pemikiran Syuhudi Ismail. El-Wasathy: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(2).

Srifariyati. (2020). Urgensi Ilmu Jarah Wa Ta’dil dalam Menentukan Kualitas Hadits. Jurnal Madaniyah, 10(1).

Syamsudin, K. (2017). Manhaj Ibnu Abî Hâtim Dalam Kitab Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dîl. Diroyah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v2i1.2491

Syamsul, I., Labib, M. A. D. I., & Anisa, F. N. (2024). Ilmu AL-JARḤ WA AL-TA’DIL Dalam Hadis (Studi Komparatif Metodologi Ibnu Hajar Al-Asqalani dan Ibnu Hatim Ar-Razi). Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 16(2).

Thahan, M. (1985). Taysir Musthalah al-Hadits. Haramain.

Wahidah, R., Muhlis, Fauzi, A., & Hadi, S. (2024). Total Quality Management (TQM) dalam Pendidikan Tinggi Perspektif Manal Hani. Karya Bakti Makmur.

Widodo, H., & Irfanudin, F. (2020). Al Jarh wa At-Ta’dil in Researching Sanad Hadits. Journal of Hadith Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v3i1.547

Zain, M. M. (2017). Perbedaan Maratib Ta’dil Di Kalangan Ulama Hadis. Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis. Diroyah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v2i1.2492

Zubaidillah, M. H. (2018). ILMU JARH WA TA’DIL. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/y8wt6