Ekspresi Tajdid dalam Syarah Hadis: Kajian Historis atas Subul al-Salām karya al-Ṣanʿānī (w. 1182 H/1769 M)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v6i2-01Keywords:
Hadith Commentary, Subul al-Salām, al-Ṣanʿānī, TajdīdAbstract
Subul al-Salām by al-Ṣanʿānī represents a critique of sectarian fanaticism within Islamic jurisprudence, articulated through his commentary on hadith. This critique is closely linked to al-Ṣanʿānī’s concern over the decline of the Muslim ummah in the Arab region during the 11th–12th centuries AH, which in turn spurred the discourse of Islamic intellectual reform as a response. Through a historical inquiry, this study aims to explore the relationship between his commentary on Bulūgh al-Marām and the socio-cultural dynamics experienced by al-Ṣanʿānī. This research is based on library sources and employs a qualitative method. It addresses three key questions: a) In what ways can the tendency to disengage from rigid adherence to a particular school of law be identified as a defining characteristic of al-Ṣanʿānī’s hadith commentary in Subul al-Salām? b) What historical factors contributed to the emergence of this characteristic? c) How do these factors correlate with the transformation toward a new model of understanding hadith commentary? The findings of this study reveal that al-Ṣanʿānī employed a critical and corrective approach to interpreting hadith, often engaging with and reassessing views from various legal schools. There is a close connection between the paradigm of Ibn Taymiyyah, which had developed as a discourse of tajdīd in the Arab-Islamic world at the time, and al-Ṣanʿānī’s dissatisfaction with sectarian conflicts, particularly in his homeland, Yemen. Ultimately, Subul al-Salām is also associated with his decision to renounce the Zaydī madhhab and adopt a non-aligned stance, free from commitment to any single madhhab.Downloads
References
Abdurrahman, D. (2011). Metodologi penelitian sejarah Islam. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
al-Bassām, ʿA. ʿA. (2003). Tawḍīḥ al-Aḥkām min Bulūgh al-Marām. Makkah: Maktabat al-Asadī.
al-Nūrī, S., & al-Mālikī, Ḥ. S. (1996). Ibānat al-aḥkām (2 vol.). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
al-Ṣanʿānī, M. I. A. (2000). Subul al-Salām al-Mawṣūlah ilā Bulūgh al-Marām (tahqīq Muḥammad Ṣubḥī Ḥasan Ḥallāq, 8 jil.). Jeddah–Riyadh: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.
--------. (2007). al-Anfās al-Raḥmāniyyah al-Yamaniyyah fī Abḥāth al-Ifādah al-Madaniyyah (taḥqīq ʿAlī ibn ʿAbduh ibn ʿAlī al-Almaʿī). Riyāḍ: Maktabat al-Rushd.
Amir, A. N. (2021). Diskursus Perkembangan Ilmu Syarah Hadith: Sebuah Kajian Metodologis dan Historis. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 1(2), 101-118.
Anis, F., & Fauziah, U. (2019). San'ani's View on Women Authority in the Book of Subul al-Salam. Al-Zahra: Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies, 16(1).
Atabik, A., & Mustaqim, M. (2020). Political, Religious and Social Unrest in Yemen in the 18th And 19th Centuries during the Late Ottoman Dynasty. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 10(2), 89-105.
Darussalam, A. (2014). Aplikasi Metode Tahlili dalam Fiqhi Al-Hadis (Telaah Kitab Subul al-Salam, Hadis tentang Sucinya Air). Jurnal Tafsere, 2(1).
Daud, Z. F. M., Irwanto, I., & Fata, A. K. (2022). Hadits Tentang Darah Wanita Menurut Al-Shan’ani: Suatu Telaah Mukhtalaf al-Hadits. Farabi, 19(1), 49-67.
Dresch, P. (1989). Tribes, government, and history in Yemen. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fasiʿfas, ʿA. Q. I. M. (2007). Tarjiḥāt al-Imām al-Ṣanʿānī fī Subul al-Salām: Dirasah fiqhiyyah muqārinah fī Kitāb al-Ṭahārah wa al-Ṣalāh (Tesis, al-Jāmiʿah al-Islāmiyyah Ghazzā, ʿAmādah al-Dirasah al-ʿUlyā, Kullīyah al-Sharīʿah, Qism al-Fiqh al-Muqārin).
Gulpaygani, ʿA. R. (2014). Kalam Islam: Kajian Teologis dan Isu-Isu Kemazhaban (M. Jawad Bafaqiḥ, Terj.). Jakarta: Nur al-Huda.
Hasan, M. ʿA. (1995). Perbandingan Mazhab. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hitti, P. K. (2013). History of the Arabs (R. C. L. Yasin & D. S. Riyadi, Terj.). Jakarta: Serambi.
Kuntowijoyo. (2008). Penjelasan Sejarah: Historical Explanation. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Lapidus, I. M. (1997). Islamic revival and modernity: The contemporary movements and the historical paradigms. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 40(4), 444–460.
Maryam, S., et al. (2003). Sejarah Peradaban Islam: dari Masa Klasik hingga Modern. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Adab UIN Sunan Kalijaga dan LESFI.
Nabil, A. A., & Rahman, T. A. (2021). Perkembangan Ilmu Syarah Hadith: Suatu Telaah Ringkas. RUSYDIAH: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 2(2), 96-121.
Nurliana, N. (2017). Metode Istinbath Hukum Muhammad Ibn Ismail Al-Shan’ani dalam Kitab Subul Al-Salam. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 5(2), 132-174.
Robinson, F. (1987). Säkularisierung im Islam. In W. Schluchter (Ed.), Max Webers Sicht des Islams (pp. 256–271). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Rodrigues, A. (2002). Wahhabism and" The Peoples’ Islam" in the Arabian Peninsula. Values in Islamic Culture and the Experience of History, 105-123.
Rostoványi, Z. (2013). From “Totalizing Islam” to “Secular Islam” Islamic Civilization under the Dual Pressure of Retraditionalization and Modernization. Studies on Political Islam and Islamic Political Thought, 3-61.
Rusli, N. (1999). Konsep ijtihad al-Syaukani: Relevansinya bagi pembaruan hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Logos.
Santosa, S. (2016). Melacak Jejak Pensyarahan Kitab Hadis. Diroyah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 1(1).
Syarifuddin, A. (1997). Ushul Fiqih (2 vol.). Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu.
ʿUlaymī, A. M. (1986). al-Ṣanʿānī wa Kitābuhu Tawdīḥ al-Afkār (Cet. 1). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah & Dubai: Dār al-Ummah.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Hadith Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
