Lanskap Pemikiran Hadis di Amerika: Gagasan Jonathan A.C Brown tentang Kritik Matan

Noufal P. Tumewu; Padli  Ismail

doi:10.32506/johs.v5i2-04

Authors

Noufal P. Tumewu Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Gorontalo Author
Padli Ismail Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Gorontalo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v5i2-04

Keywords:

Jonathan A.C Brown, American Regional Hadith Thought, matan criticism

Abstract

This paper attempts to review the landscape of hadith development in America and focuses on one of the ideas that examines the study of hadith text criticism by Jonathan A.C Brown in his article The Rules Matn Criticism: There Are No Rules. Exploring how Brown criticizes hadith text studies which in his view have received less attention from scholars and Islamic researchers, the results of this review show that the criticism presented by Brown leads to the absence of methodologically determined criteria for matan criticism. He proves this by giving examples of several scholars who reject hadiths that are considered flawed in terms of matan, but at other times take hadiths that according to Brown have the same flaws. This uncertainty is what makes Brown assume that scholars and researchers pay less attention to matan studies compared to sanad studies which are considered more important in determining the quality of a hadith. This review uses a library research type of research by looking at Brown's ideas through several of his statements related to hadith studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, Hasyim. Kritik Hadist versus Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha, (Yogyakarta: Kalimedia, 2016)

Baghdadi. Al-Jami’ li Akhlaq Al-Rawi wa Adab Al-Sami, ed. Muhammad ‘Ajjaj al-Khatib, (Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1997)

Bakir Muhammad. Kritik Matan Hadist Versi Muhaddisin dan Fuqoha: Studi Pemikiran Hasjim Abbas, Jurnal Samawat, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2018)

Brown Jonathan. How We Knaw Early Hadist Critics Did Main Criticism and Why it’s So Hard to Find, dalam Islamic Law and Society, Vol. 15, No.2 (2018)

Brown Jonathan. The Rules of Matn Criticism: There are No Rules, Islamic Law and Society,Vol. 19, No 4 (2012)

Devi Aulia Diana. Studi Kritik Matan Hadits, Jurnal Al-Dzikra, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2020) h. 301.

Hudaya Hairul. Metodologi Kritik Matan Hadis Menurut Al-Adlabidari Teori Ke Aplikasi, Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2014)

Id. Al-Iqtinah fi Bayan Al-Istilah, ed, Beirut: Dar Al-Basha’ir Al-Islamiyyah, 2006

Jassas Bakr Ahmad, Usul al-Jassas, ed, Muhammad Muhammad Tamir (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1420/2000)

Al-Qaraḍawī, Y. (2004). Kaifa Nata‘āmal Ma‘a AsSunnah An-Nabawiyyah. Kairo: Dār asy-Syūrūq.

Jonathan A.C Brown. (2007). The Canonization of al-Bukhari and Muslim: The Formation and Function of the Sunni Hadith Canon. Brill.

Jonathan A.C Brown. (2010). The Transmission and Collection of Prophetic Traditions. Retrieved from https://ahadithstudies.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/brown-hadith-collection.pdf

Katsir. Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-‘Azim, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1995)

Lutfi Khabibi Muhammad. Kritik Matan sebagai Metode Utama dalam Kesahihan Hadist Nabi, Jurnal Islamic Review, Vol. 2, No. 3 (2013)

Matson Ingrid. Ulumul Qur’an Zaman Kita, (Jakarta: Zaman, 2013)

Munawwir Haris, Kritik Matan Hadis: Versi Ahli-ahli Hadist, Jurnal Al-Irfani, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2011)

Qamarullah Muhammad. Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Muhammad Tahir Al-Jawabi dalam Kitab: Juhud Al-Muhaddisin fi Naqd Matan Al-Hadis Al-Nabawi Al-Syarif, Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Hadist, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2018)

Suyuti. Al-Ta’zim wa Al-Minna fi Anna Abaway Rasulullah fi Al-Jannah, Silsilat Matbu’at Da’irat Al-Ma’rif Al-Utsmaniyyah, ed. Husnain Muhammad Makhluf, (Kairo: Dar Jawami’ al-Kalim, 1915).

Tahawi. Sharh Mushkil al-Atbar, ed. Shuaib al-Arnauth, (Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1494), Vol. 15. No. 1,

Website:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilali_Document

https://hidayatuna.com/tokoh-tokoh-penyebar-islam-di-amerika-serikat/