Transformasi Ideologi dan Kritik Rasional terhadap Hadis Mut’ah: Studi Hermeneutis Interpretasi Sayyīd Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v5i2-02Keywords:
Husain al-Musawi, Mut'ah, Gadamer's Hermeneutics, Ideological Transformation, Shi'a Internal CriticismAbstract
This study aims to explore Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī's Interpretation of the Mut'ah Hadiths in his book Lillāhi Thumma Lī Al-Tārīkh: Kashfu Al-Asrāri Wa Tabri'atu Al-A'immati Al-Athār and how the Context of Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī's Ideological Shift Affects His Interpretation of the Mut'ah Marriage Hadiths. This discussion is interesting because nikah mut'ah, which is doctrinally considered valid in the Shi'a tradition, was sharply criticized by a scholar of ahl al-Bait, who was previously part of the Shi'a scholar himself. As an insider-turned-internal critic, Al-Mūsawī displays a deep intellectual and spiritual struggle, reflecting the tension between tradition and rationality. This study uses a qualitative method with Gadamer's hermeneutic analysis knife to understand the involvement of historical context in the interpretation of texts. This study found that Ḥusain Al-Mūsawī's interpretation of the nikah mut'ah hadith underwent significant changes as a result of his ideological shift from the Shi'a school to a more rational and contextual approach. Al-Mūsawī considers that the hadiths that support mut'ah, even though they are found in the books of Shi'a mu'tabar, are no longer worthy of argument because they are full of distortions of meaning, contrary to the Qur'an, common sense, and modern social values. In addition, he also considered his historical awareness and life experiences in reading the hadith texts. The transformation of Sayyid Husain al-Musawi's thought shows how pre-understanding and historical experience can reshape the meaning of religious texts. His criticism of mut'ah and other Shi'a doctrines is not merely an emotional reaction, but an intellectual reflection rooted in moral and scientific responsibility. This study opens up space for a more critical and inclusive cross-sectarian dialogue.Downloads
References
ABI. (2012). Buku Putih Mazhab Syiah Menurut Para Ulamanya yang Muktabar. Dewan Pengurus Pusat Ahlul Bait Indonesia.
Ahmad, J. (2018). Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis dalam Perspektif Ahlussunah dan Syiah. Journal Of Qur’ an And Hadith Studies, 6(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17689.52323
Aksin Wijaya. (2022). Fenomena Berislam: Geneologi dan Orientasi Berislam Menurut al-Qur’an (Muhammad Ali Fakih (ed.); Cet. 1). IRCiSoD.
Al-Ghiṭȃ’, M. al-H. A. K. (2006). Aṣl al-Shi’ah wa Uṣūliha, Muqaranah Ma’a al-Madhahib al-Arba’ah.
al-Musawi al-Ghuraifi. (1986). Qawa’idu al-Hadits (Cet. 2 (ed.)). Daru al-Adhwa.
Al-Musawi, H. (2010). Lillahi Tsumma li Al-Tarikh Kasyfu Al-Asrari wa Tabriatu Al-Aimmati Al-Athari.
Al-Musawi, M. (1988). Al-Syiah wa Al-Tashih: al-Shira’ Baina Al-Syiah wa Al-Tasyayyu’. The Prince Ghazi Trust For Qur’anic Thought.
Al-Musawi, M. (2001). Mazhab Syiah Kajian Al-Quran dan Sunnah. Muthahhari Press.
Anas Rohman. (2020). Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman Dalam Kajian Qur’an-Hadis (Telaah Kritis). Progress: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Universitas Wahid Hasyim, 8(1), 184–198.
Dimyati, N. (2008). Syiah Ahlulbait AS. (Cet. 1). Lembaga Internasional Ahlul Bait.
Fahmi, A. (2016). Analisis Nāsikh-Mansūkh dalam Hadits (Studi Kasus Hadits Nikah Mut’ah). In Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Hans-Georg Gadamer. (2004). Truth And Method (Cet. 3). Continuum.
Haqqi, M. N. (2014). Pendekatan Epistemologi Dan Intersubjektif Atas Hadis-Hadis Nikah Mut’ah. Al-Ahkam, 24(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2014.24.2.147
Hasan Sadri al-’Amili. (n.d.). Nihayatu al-Dirayah. Maktabah Mu’min Quraish.
Hauqola, N. (2013). HERMENEUTIKA HADIS: Upaya Memecah Kebekuan Teks. Jurnal TEOLOGIA, 24(1), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2013.24.1.324
Kalam, D. (2011). Pandangan Muhammad Husein Thabathaba’I Tentang Nikah Mut’Ah Dalam Tafsir Al-Mīzan. UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim.
Lestari, L. (2019). Epistemologi Hadis Perspektif Syiah. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 2(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v2i1.1130
Majid Ma’arif. (2012). Sejarah Hadis (Cet. 1). Nur al-Huda.
Malik, M. A. (2015). Wawasan Hadis Tentang Nikah Mut’ah (Suatu Kajian Mawdhu’iy). Al-Ma’iyyah, 8(2), 285–324.
Muhajirin, C. M. (2018). Hadis-Hadis Sunni Dalam Kitab Mut’ah Al-Nisa’ Fi Al-Kitab Wa Al-Sunnah (Analisis Komentar dan Pemahaman Ja’far Subhani tentang Hadis-hadis Nikah Mut’ah). In Tesis. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Muhammad al-Kulaini. (1993). Furu’u al-Kafi Jilid 3 (Cet. 3). Daru al-ta’aruf lii al-Mathbu’at.
Muhammad Al-Tijani Al-Samawi. (1999). Akhirnya Kutemukan Kebenaran.
Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi. (1983). Biharu al-Anwar Jilid 65. Daru Ihya’ al-Turats al-’Arabi.
Muhammad bin Ali al-Qummi. (1429). Man La Yahdhuruhu al-Faqih Jilid 3 (Ali Akbar al-Ghifari (ed.); cet. 5). Muassasatu al-Nasyr al-Islami.
Muhammad bin Husain al-Thusi. (n.d.). Tahdzibu al-Ahkam (Cet. 1). Maktabaru al-Shaduq.
Mulla Fathullah al-Kasyani. (n.d.). Tafsir Manhaji al-Shadiqin Fii Ilzami al-Mukhalafiin Jilid 2 (Cet. 3). Toko Buku Muhammad Hasan Elmi.
Muslim. (2016). Pemikiran Muhammad Al-Ghazali dalam Kajian Hadits. AISE Az Ziqri Kajian Keislaman Dan Kependidikan, 1–23.
Muslim bin Hajjaj. (2000). Shahih Muslim (cet. 2). Darussalam.
Nasir, M. (2014). Kriteria Kesahihan Hadis Perspektif Syiah. Farabi, 11(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/19070993
PUTRA, A. S. (2019). Hukum Nikah Mut’ah Menurut Ibnu Asyur. In UIN Walisongo (Vol. 53, Issue 1). UIN Walisongo.
Rahman, H. C. Z. A., Ghozali, I., & Irwanto, M. (2021). Pengaruh Politik Sunni & Syiah Terhadap Perkembangan Ilmu Hadis (Nuraini (ed.)). Rajawali Press.
Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi Al-Husaini. (2008). kenapa Aku Meninggalkan Syiah (I. Sulaiman (ed.)). Pustaka Al-Kautsar.
Sayyid Hasan Ash-Shadr. (n.d.). Peradaban Syiah Dan Ilmu Ke-Islaman (A. Fauzi (ed.)). Departemen Kebudayaan Majma’ Jahani Ahlul Bait a.s.
Shihab, M. Q. (2014). Sunnah Syiah Bergandengan Tangan! Mungkinkah? (Abd. Syakur Dj. (ed.); IV). Penerbit Lentera Hati.
Subhani, J. (1999). Yang Hangat & Kontroversial Dalam Fiqih (I. Kurniawan (ed.); 1st ed.). Lentera Basritama.
Syarafuddin al-Musawi. (2001). Dialog Sunnah –Syiah (Cet. 9). Mizan.
Syirazi, N. M. (2009). Inilah Aqidah Syiah (Cet. 2). Muassasah Asri al-Dzuhuri.
Yusof, A. (n.d.). Abdullah bin Saba’: Analisis dari Perspektif Cendikiawan Islam. Jurnal Usuluddin, 81–94.
Zarkasyi, H. F. (2014). Teologi Dan Ajaran Shi’ah Menurut Refrensi Induknya (Henri Shalahuddin (ed.); 1st ed.). Insists.
Zulkifli. (2013). Sejarah Kemunculan Dan Perkembangan Syiah. Jurnal Khatulistiwa – Journal Of Islamic Studies, 3(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Raja Fahrul Reza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.