From Narrator Criticism to Digital Identity Criticism: A Reconstruction of the Principle of al-Jarḥ wa al-Ta’dīl
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v9i1-01Keywords:
Digital Identity Criticism, Principles of al-jarh wa al-ta’dil, Verification Methods, Deepfake HoaxesAbstract
Digital information verification has thus far been confined to content assessment, neglecting the authenticity of source identity, precisely the element currently being fabricated by deepfake technology. This gap underlies the present study's attempt to reconstruct the principle of al-jarḥ wa al-ta'dīl into a digital identity criticism model. To address this gap, a qualitative method using a grounded theory approach is employed to develop a conceptual framework for the transformation of al-jarḥ wa al-ta'dīl from a method of narrator credibility criticism into a framework for digital identity criticism in verifying deepfake hoaxes. Data were collected through documentation techniques, namely inventorying, closely reading, recording, classifying, and comparing documents according to themes relevant to the research focus, and were subsequently analyzed using the interactive model of Miles et al., encompassing data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. Findings indicate that the reconstruction of al-jarḥ wa al-ta'dīl broadens the scope of hadith criticism, extending it from evaluating narrator credibility to criticizing source authenticity and credibility within an artificial-intelligence-based digital information ecosystem. 'Adālah and ḍabṭ are shown to possess a more fundamental epistemological function, extending beyond their conventional role as classical criteria for the acceptance of narrators (rāwī). This function further signals a fundamental shift in the structure of informational authority, which in turn gives rise to a model of digital identity criticism grounded in the principles of al-jarḥ wa al-ta'dīl. As its principal contribution, digital identity criticism is formulated as a conceptual and methodological development within hadith studies, repositioning the function of al-jarḥ wa al-ta'dīl from criticizing narrator credibility toward an epistemological framework for evaluating synthetic sources in the deepfake era.
Downloads
References
Akmaliah, W. (2020). The Demise of Moderate Islam: New Media, Contestation, and Reclaiming Religious Authorities. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v10i1.1-24
Akmaliah, W. (2022). Reclaiming Moderate Islam in Nahdlatul Ulama: Challenging the Dominant Religious Authority in Digital Platform. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 16(1), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2022.16.1.223-248
Al-Ayyubi, M. Z. (2018). Etika Bermedia Sosial dalam Menyikapi Pemberitaan Bohong (Hoax) Perspektif Hadis. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 19(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1902-02
Amin, K. (2005). The Reliability of the Traditional Science of Hadith: A Critical Reconsideration. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 43(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2005.432.255-281
Amrulloh. (2019). The Narration Analysis of ‘Abbâd B. Ya‘qûb as a Syiah Râfiḍah Narrator in the Main Hadith Book of Sunni. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 27(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v27i1.6392
Andriansyah, Y. (2023). The Current Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Religious Studies: Some Reflections Based on ChatGPT. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 22(1), ix–xviii. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol22.iss1.editorial
Ansori, I. H., Rahman, & Darussamin, Z. (2020). A Genealogy of ‘Ilal Al-Hadîth Study: Tracing the Historical Root Gene of Existence and Development the Study of ‘Ilal Al-Hadith. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i1.9215
Chandra, A. F., & Buchari, M. (2016). Kriteria Ke-Shahih-an Hadis menurut al-Khathib al-Baghdadi dalam Kitab al-Kifayah fi ‘Ilm al-Riwayah. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 24(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v24i2.1725
Cloete, A. L. (2016). Mediated Religion: Implications for Religious Authority. Verbum et Ecclesia, 37(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1544
Fahimah, S. (2014). Sistem Isnad dan Otentisitas Hadits: Kajian Orientalis dan Gugatan Atasnya. ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam, 15(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v15i2.2651
Firdaus, M. T., & Suryadilaga, M. A. (2019). Integrasi Keilmuan dalam Kritik Matan Hadis. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 18(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v18i2.96
Fmprc.gov.cn. (2026). Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on March 3, 2026. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/202603/t20260303_11867987.html
Gorian, E., & Osman, N. D. (2024). Digital Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.798
Graf, A., & Muslimin, J. M. (2022). Social Media, Muslim Community, and the Pandemic: Context-Oriented Approaches to Misinformation and Disinformation in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 16(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2022.16.2.279-302
Hermansah, T., Fakhruroji, M., & Muslim, A. (2026). Bourdieu and the Contestation of Religious Authority in the Indonesian Social Media Landscape. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 26(1), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v261.35108
Hidayati, D. (2022). Online Sufism and Reestablishing Religious Authority. Ulumuna, 26(1), 204–237. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v26i1.488
HS, M. A. (2020). Kajian Hadis Mustafa Azami Sebagai Kerja Hermeneutika: Analisis Kajian Sanad dan Matan Hadis dalam Studies in Hadith Methodologi and Literature Karya Mustafa Azami. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 28(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i1.7551
Husein, A. (2021). Periwayat Syiah dalam Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Mutawatir, 11(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2021.11.1.99-126
Ichwan, M. N., Pabbajah, M., & Amin, F. (2024). Digitization of Religious Tafsir: The Fading of Indonesian Ulama Authority in Post Truth Era. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 25(2), 320–345. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i2.5545
Idri. (2010). Kritik Ḥadīth dalam Perspektif Studi Kontemporer. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 4(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2010.4.2.261-279
Idri. (2012). Between the Criticism of Hadîts and Hadîts Probativeness. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 7(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v7i2.325
Ilahi, M. B. R., Razi, F., Maulana, A., & Najib, B. (2023). Hadith Critics Categories in The Selection of Hadith Narrators: A Comparative Analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah, 20(2), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i2.16787
Ilmiyah, D., & Hussin, M. N. (2025). Mawdu’ Hadith in the Digital Landscape: Epistemic Challenges and Contemporary Islamic Literacy. Islam Transformatif: Journal of Islamic Studies, 9(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.30983/islamtransformatif.v9i2.10384
Isnaeni, A. (2016). Problematika Perilaku Bidah dalam Kritik Hadis. Mutawatir, 6(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2016.6.1.135-159
Istianah, & Wahyuningsih, S. (2019). The Hadith Digitization in Millennial Era: A Study at Center for Hadith Studies, Indonesia. QIJIS: Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v7i1.4900
Kannike, U. M. M., & Fahm, A. O. (2025). Exploring the Ethical Governance of Artificial Intelligence from an Islamic Ethical Perspective. Jurnal Fiqh, 22(1), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol22no1.5
Keskin, A. (2025). Analysis of the Video “The Miraculous Life of the Prophet Muhammad | The First Islamic Artificial Intelligence Documentary 4 K” in the Context of Debates on Artificial Intelligence and Digitalisation in Religion. Darulfunun Ilahiyat, 36(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2025.36.1.1631563
Mahmud, A. (2014). ‘Adâlat al-Sahâbah dalam Perspektif Sunnî dan Shî‘ah. Mutawatir, 4(2), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2014.4.2.324-341
Meerangani, K. A., Harun, M. S., & Mansor, M. S. (2025). Principles of Fiqh in AI-Based Information Dissemination on Social Media. Jurnal Fiqh, 22(2), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol22no2.2
Meerangani, K. A., Nor, M. R. M., Hamid, M. F. A., Yusof, M. A. M., & Ariffin, M. F. M. (2025). Digital Tabayyun: Integrating the Quran and Artificial Intelligence in Filtering Social Media Information. QURANICA - International Journal of Quranic Research, 17(2), 370–389. https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol17no2.15
Meerangani, K. A., Rosele, M. I., Hamid, M. F. A., & Rokhibi, I. A. M. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in the Realm of Fatwa: An Analytical Study on Its Use as a Reference Tool in Malaysia. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 31(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no1.721
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Naim, N., & Kurniawan, C. S. (2025). Popular Kyai and New Authorities: A Case Study of Kyai Abdullah Sam. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 25(2), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v25i2.20757
Rahim, S. F. A., Rahman, M. F. A., Thaidi, H. A. A., Azimi, N. N. M. A. B. N. M., & Jailani, M. R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence for Fatwa Issuance: Guidelines and Ethical Considerations. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 30(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol30no1.654
Ramadhani, E. R., Rachmawati, A. R., & Kurnikova, R. H. (2025). Integrating Islamic Values with the Right to Be Forgotten: A Legal Approach to Addressing Deepfake Pornography in Indonesia. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 17(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.28880
Rosidi, M. H., Mokhtar, A. W., & Majid, M. N. A. (2022). Penggunaan Media Dalam Talian Menurut Perspektif Maqāṣid Al-Shari‘Ah: The Use of Online Media in the Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Shari‘ah. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 27(3), 78–105. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol27no3.451
Salma, Y., Kamilah, Z., Kamil, A. Z., Iwanebel, F. Y., & Maulana, M. I. (2025). Narrative Hermeneutics as Digital Tafsīr: Reconstructing Qur’anic Meaning and Religious Authority on Instagram @NadirsyahHosen_Official. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 23(2), 733–772. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v23i2.1492
Saputra, A., & Asbi, E. A. (2025). Islam, Big Data, and Digital Ethics: Challenges in Religious Life in the Digital Age. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(4). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.4022
Saputra, E., & Fadhli, F. (2020). Media Baru, Fragmentasi Dan Kontestasi Otoritas Keagamaan Di Aceh: Dari Ulama Lokal Ke Ustaz. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 18(2), 429–462. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v18i2.806
Saputra, T. A., & Suryadilaga, M. A. (2020). Perkembangan dan Kesahihan Hadis Dari Awal Islam Hingga Zaman Post Truth. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah, 17(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v17i1.7902
Siregar, M. (1994). Kritik Sanad Hadis “Qiyam Al-Lail Nabi pada Bulan Ramadan.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 56, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.1994.056.59-72
Siregar, M. H., Andy.N, N., Abdurrahman, Z., Kamal, M., & Zainal, Z. (2025). Digital Fiqh and Ethical Governance: Negotiating Islamic Normativity and Online Narcissism in Contemporary Indonesia. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 24(1), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i1.13218
Siswanto, D. (2020). The Paradigm of Matn Hadith Criticism and Its Transformation in the Modern Era. ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(1), 130–157. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i1.8936
Suhendra, A. (2014). Kriteria Hadis Hasan menurut al-Suyûtî dalam al-Jâmi‘ al-Saghîr. Mutawatir, 4(2), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2014.4.2.342-355
Turnbackhoax.id. (2026). [SALAH] China Bakal Lindungi Iran dari Serangan AS. https://turnbackhoax.id/articles/32814-salah-china-bakal-lindungi-iran-dari-serangan-as
Turner, B. A. (1983). The Use Of Grounded Theory For The Qualitative Analysis Of Organizational Behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00211.x
Ulum, M. B. (2022). The Companions: Redefining Criteria and Reconsidering ‘Adâla Critique From Qur’an and Hadith. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 30(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v30i2.15450
Umar, A. (2011). Budaya Kritik Ulama Hadis Perspektif Historis dan Praktis. Mutawatir, 1(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2011.1.2.193-216
Usman, E., Nurdin, N., Ahmed, A., & Huda, M. (2023). A Netnography Analysis of Thematic Hadith Memes Distribution on Social Media. Al-Albab, 12(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v12i2.2778
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51
Zaman, M. B. (2018). Kritik Hadis Perspektif Akram Diya’ al-‘Umari. Mutawatir, 8(2), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2018.8.2.317-345
Zhorabek, Z. G., Baitenova, N. Z., Abzhalov, S. U., Alimkhanova, A. A., Baigaraev, J., Kenzheyev, O. O., Sadvakasova, A. K., & Kurmanbek, A. (2025). Digital Post-Islamism and the Cognitive Transformation of Islamic Belief: A Comparative Study. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(5). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.522
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mhd. Rasidin, Darti Busni (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










