Kritik Matan Hadis Dispensasi Abu Lahab dalam Bingkai Shalahuddin Al-Idlibi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v8i1-01Keywords:
Matan Criticism, Hadith on Abu Lahab’s Punishment Exemption, Punishment Exemption, Shalahuddin Al-Idlibi, Bukhari HadithAbstract
This study critically examines Bukhari Hadith number 5101, which narrates Abu Lahab's exemption from punishment attributed to his act of freeing the slave Tsuwaibah. Methodologically, this library-based research employs the matn criticism approach developed by Shalahuddin Al-Idlibi. Primary data sources include hadith collections, while secondary data comprises various scholarly books, journal articles, Qur'anic interpretation, sirah nabawiyah, and other literature relevant to the research context. The research findings indicate that the hadith's matn does not contradict Qur’anic verses, other authentic hadiths, sirah nabawiyah, rationality, or existing historical facts, and does not have a haphazard meaning. The applied metanarrative criticism definitively confirms that the additional narrative concerning Abu Lahab’s exemption from punishment constitutes a narratorial insertion (idraj). Crucially, this insertion does not diminish the hadith’s overall authenticity, neither in its isnad nor its matn. This study particularly highlights the importance of matn criticism, an area that has historically received less academic attention compared to isnad criticism. Furthermore, it aims to foster the development of more applicable methods of matn criticism within contemporary hadith scholarship. The implications of this research are expected to both enrich existing hadith research methodologies and clarify public understanding regarding the validity of narratives about Abu Lahab’s exemption from punishment.
Downloads
References
Abror, I. (2020). Ilmu Matan Hadis. Kalimedia.
Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Al-Mahdi. (1419). Al-Bahr Al-Madid fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Majid. Dr. Hasan Abas Zaki.
Ahmad Syarif Al-Na’san. (2017). Bab-Al-Tarajim—7.Syekh Muhammad Sa’id Al-Idlibi rahimahullah. https://www.naasan.net/index.php?page=YXJ0aWNsZQ==&op=ZGlzcGxheV9hcnRpY2xlX2RldGFpbHNfdQ==&article_id=MjYyMw==&lan=YXI=
Aini, S. Q. (2021). Kritik Matan Hadis Perspektif Mahmud Abū Rayyah. Alhamra Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v2i2.11815
Al-Akili, M. M. (1991). Ibn Seerïn’s Dictionary Of Dreams According To Islamic Inner Traditions. Pearl Publishing House.
Al-’Asqalani, A. bin ’Ali bin H. (1379). Fath Al-Bari Syarh Shahih Al-Bukhari. Daar al-Ma’rifah.
Al-Baihaqi, A. bin A.-H. bin A. bin M. (1989). Al-Sunan Al-Shaghir li Al-Baihaqi. Jami’ah Al-Dirasat Al-Islamiyyah.
Al-Bukhari, M. bin I. (2002). Shahih Al-Bukhari. Daar Ibn Katsir.
Ali Yasmanto dan Siti Rohmaturrosyidah Ratnawati. (2019). STUDI KRITIK MATAN HADIS: Kajian Teoritis dan Aplikatif Untuk Menguji Kesahihan Matan Hadis. Al-Bukhārī: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, Vol. 2(2).
Alias, M. S. (2019). Pemikiran Kefalsafahan Al-Ghazali Berkaitan Mimpi [Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Thought about Dream]. 4, 26–36.
Al-Idlibi, S. A.-D. bin A. (2013). Manhaj Naqd Al-Matn Inda Ulama Al-Hadis Al-Nabawi. Daar Al-Fath.
Al-Jauzi, A. A.-R. bin A. bin M. (t.t). Kasyf Al-Musykil min Hadits Al-Shahihain. Dar Al-Wathn.
Al-Judai’, A. bin Y. (2003). Tahrir ’Ulum Al-Hadis. Muassasah Al-Rayyan.
Al-Khalwati, I. H. bin M. (t.t). Ruh Al-Bayan. Daar Al-Fikr.
Al-Maliki, M. bin A. (1996). Tarikh Al-Hawadits wa Al-Ahwal Al-Nabawiyah. Hai’ah As-Shofwah Al-Malikiyah.
Al-Maliki, M. bin ’Alawi. (2006). Al-I’lam bi Fatawa Aimmah Al-Islam Haul Maulidih ’Alaih Al-Shalah wa Al-Salam. Dar Al-Kutub Al-’Ilmiyyah.
Al-Marwazi, M. bin N. bin A.-H. (1408). Al-Sunnah Li Al-Marwazi. Muassasah Al-Kutub Al-Tsaqafiyah.
Al-Shan’ani, A. A.-R. (1403). Al-Mushannaf Abd Al-Razzaq. Al-Maktab Al-Islami.
Al-Suyuthi, J. A.-D. ’Abd A.-R. A. B. (1996). Tadrib Al-Rawi fi Syarh Taqrib Al-Nawawi. Daar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah.
Al-Suyuthi, J. A.-D. ’Abd A.-R. A. B. (2006). Al-Hawi li Al-Fatawi. Dar Al-Kutub Al-’Ilmiyyah.
Al-Syirbini, M. bin A. A.-K. (1285). Al-Siraj Al-Munir. Al-Amirah.
Al-Tahanawi, D. A. A.-U. (1984). Qawa’id fi Ulum Al-Hadis. Maktab Al-Mathbu’at Al-Islamiyyah.
Al-Thabari, M. bin J. (t.t). Tarikh Al-Thabari. Bait Al-Afkar Al-Dauliyyah.
Al-Vidatuz Zuhriah dan Khusna Farida Shilviana. (2020). KRITIK MATAN DAN URGENSINYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN HADIS: Studi Hadis Puasa Daud. Al-Bukhārī: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, Vol. 3(1).
Andariati, L. (2020). Hadis dan Sejarah Perkembangannya. Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v4i2.4680
Arsip Forum Ilmu Hadis III. (n.d.). Forum Biografi Ulama Kontemporer “siapa itu Shalahuddin Al-Idlibi”, j. 155, hlm. 149. https://al-maktaba.org/book/31616/77451
Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Pemetaan Penelitian Hadis: Analisis Skripsi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, Vol. 6(2), 191. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/riwayah/article/view/7752
Forum Kesatria Kebudayaan. (2013). Al-Ustadz/Shalah Al-Din Al-Idlibi. https://omferas.com/vb/t44716/
Fullatah, U. bin H. U. (1981). Al-Wadh’ fi Al-Hadis. Muassasah Manahil Al-Irfan.
Hudaya, H. (2014). METODOLOGI KRITIK MATAN HADIS MENURUT AL-ADLABIDARI TEORI KE APLIKASI. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 13(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v13i1.701
Ibnu Majah Muhammad bin Yazid. (t.t). Sunan Ibnu Majah. Daar Ihya’ al Kutub al ’Arabiyyah.
Ibnu Sa’ad, M. (1408). Al-Thabaqat Al-Kubra. Maktabah Al-Ulum wa Al-Hukm.
Isma’il bin Umar bin Katsir. (1999). Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-’Adzim li Ibn Katsir. Daar Thaibah.
Kholis, N. (2021). Pemikiran Ibn Al-Qayyim Al-Jauziyyah Tentang Kritik Matan dan Metode Memahami Hadis Ta’arud. Dirosat : Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.28944/dirosat.v6i1.291
Khusein, A. A. (2023). HISTORY AND METHODOLOGY OF MATAN HADITH CRITICISM PERSPECTIVE OF SALAHUDIN AL-IDLIBI. MUDIR (Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan), Vol. 5(2).
Kusnandar, E. (2020). STUDI KRITIK MATAN HADIS (NAQD AL-MATN): KAJIAN SEJARAH DAN METODOLOGI. Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara, Vol. 2(1).
M. ’Ajjaj Al-Khathib. (2006). Ushul Al-Hadis Ulumuh wa Musthalahuh. Daar al-Fikr.
Mahmud Al-Thahan. (2010). Taisir Musthalah Al-Hadis. Maktabah Al-Ma’arif.
Muhammad Thahir Al-Jawabi. (n.d.). Juhud Al-Muhaddisin fi Naqd Matn Al-Hadis Al-Nabawi Al-Syarif. Muassasat Abd Al-Karim bin Abdullah.
Ramadhan, M. R. S. (2020). METODE KRITIK HADIS ALI MUSTAFA YAQUB; ANTARA TEORI DAN APLIKASI. Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.55987/njhs.v1i1.5
Razak, N. M. A. M., & Nazri, M. A. (2023). MANHAJ KRITIK MATAN HADIS MULLA ‘ALI AL-QARI. AL-TURATH JOURNAL OF AL-QURAN AND AL-SUNNAH, 8(1), Article 1. https://spaj.ukm.my/jalturath/index.php/jalturath/article/view/269
Rifa’i, M., Aziz, M. A., & Fatah, F. R. (2021). STUDI KOMPARASI MANHAJ AL-SYAUKANI (FAWAID AL-MAJMU’AH FI AL AHADIS AL-MAUDU’AH) DAN AL-IDLIBI (NAQD AL-MATN; ‘INDA ‘ULAMA AL-HADIS AN-NABAWI). Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, Vol. 7(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v7i1.2900
Ritonga, A. (2017). KONTRIBUSI PEMIKIRAN “ALA” AD-DIN IBN AHMAD AL-IDLIBI DALAM METODE KRITIK MATAN HADIS. AT-TAHDIS: Journal of Hadith Studies, 1(1), Article 1. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/attahdits/article/view/649
Saofyan, I. F., Permatasari, W., Sahib, M. A., & Rahman, A. (2023). KAJIAN METODE KRITIK MATAN HADIS. Jurnal Kajian Hadis, 1(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.36701/jawamiulkalim.v1i1.987 80
Shalahuddin bin Ahmad Al-Idlibi. (n.d.). صلاح الدين بن أحمد الإدلبي. https://www.facebook.com/salahaldin7?locale=ar_AR
Suryadi, S. (2015). Rekonstruksi Kritik Sanad dan Matan dalam Studi Hadis. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 16(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v16i2.996
Zuhri, Muh. (2003). Telaah Kritik Matan Hadis Sebuah Tawaran Metodologis. LESFI.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Irfan Fauzi, Zulfi Fadhlurrahman, Milad Ainur Rachman (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
