Teori dan Metodologi dalam Memahami Matan Hadis

Muhammad Rizki; Zumma Nihayatun Nafi’ah

doi:10.32506/johs.v3i2-04

Authors

Muhammad Rizki UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Author
Zumma Nihayatun Nafi’ah Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an Wonosobo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v3i2-04

Keywords:

Literature, Hadith, Pesantren

Abstract

The textual interpretation of hadiths without considering their historical and contextual dimensions often leads to misunderstandings, misapplications, and even radical tendencies. This study aims to answer the following research questions: What methodologies are used in understanding the text (matan) of hadith? What interpretive approaches are employed? And how can these ensure the relevance of hadith in the development of Islamic thought? Using a qualitative library research method and descriptive-analytical approach, this study reviews classical and contemporary literature, analyzing various interpretive methods and strategies. The findings reveal three primary methodologies: analytical (tahlili), synthetic (ijmali), and comparative (muqarin), supported by three techniques—textual, contextual, and intertextual interpretations—through several approaches such as linguistic, historical, and sociological. These methodological combinations allow hadiths to be interpreted holistically and responsively to contemporary challenges. This study concludes that diverse interpretive strategies are essential in maintaining the relevance of hadith while upholding its authenticity within the dynamic landscape of modern Islamic scholarship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadi, A. (2004). ’Aun al-Ma’bud Syarh Sunan Abi Dawud. Dar Ibn Hazm.

Ahmad, A. (2012). Metodologi Pemahaman Hadis; Kajian Ilmu Ma’ani al-Hadis. Alauddin University Press.

Al-’Asqalany, I. H. (2005). Fath Al-Bari bi Syarh Shahih Bukhari (1 (ed.)). Dar Thaybah.

Al-Qardhawi, Y. (1997). Bagaimana Memahami Hadis Nabi SAW (4th ed.). Karisma.

Ali, N. (2001). Memahami Hadis Nabi. CESad YPI Al-Rahmah.

As-Shiddiqiey, H. (1994). Pokok-Pokok Ilmu Dirayah Hadis. Bulan Bintang.

Asse, A. (2013). Studi Hadis Maudhu’i (Suatu Kajian Metodologi Holistik) (1st ed.). Alauddin University Press.

Badruddin, A. (1996). Umdah al-Qari Syarh Shahih al-Bukhori. Dar al-Fikr.

Baqi, M. F. A. (2017). Al-Lu’lu Wal Marjan Shahih Bukhari Muslim. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Katsir, I. (2000). Tafsir Al-Qur’an al-’Adzim. Maktabah Aulad As-Syaik At-Turats.

Khon, A. M. (2014). Takhrij dan Metode Memahami Hadis. Imprint Bumi Aksara.

Muhtador, M. (2018). Sejarah Perkembangan Metode dan Pendekatan Syarah Hadis. Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, 2(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v2i2.3130

Munawwir, A. Warsan. (1997). Kamus Al Munawwir. Pustaka Progresif.

Mustaqim, A. (2016). Ilmu Ma’anil Hadis. Idea Press.

Poerwadarminta, W. J. (1984). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.

Qatthan, M. (1995). Mabahits fi ’Ulum al-Hadits. Maktabah Wahbah, 1–384.

Rakhmat, J. (2010). Tafsir Kebahagiaan Pesan Al-Qur’an Menyikapi Kesulitan Hidup. PT SERAMBI ILMU SEMESTA.

Rusli, M., & Husain HPW Fakultas Ushuluddin dan DakwahIAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo Jln Glatik No, N. (2013). Problematika dan Solusi Masa Depan Hadis dan Ulumul Hadis. Al-Fikr, XVII (1), 130–131.

Shihab, M. Q. (2002). TAFSIR AL-MISBAH Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an, Vol 12. Lentera Hati.

Suryadi. (2008). Metode Kontemporer Memahami Hadis Nabi. Teras.

Suryadilaga, A. (2012). Metodologi Syarah Hadis. SUKA Press.

Umar, N. (2014). Deradikalisasi Pemahaman Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Yusuf, M. (2008). Metode dan Aplikasi Pemaknaan Hadis. Tim Bidang Akademik UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Zailani, Z. (2017). Metode Intertekstual Dalam Memahami Hadis Nabi. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 15(2), 298. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v15i2.4018